ABSTRACT – The work of François Laruelle is not often mentioned in the fields of communication and media studies. Those research notes propose to outline three points of intersection. The first point is a short essay Laruelle wrote specifically about communication. Alongside a brief overview of this essay, it is suggested that a model already exists –shared by various authors– that could be for communication what non-philosophy is for philosophy. This model is dubbed “non-standard communication”. The notes proceed to offer two additional ways in which this non-standard communication intersects with Laruelle’s non-philosophy. The first intersection is found in the fact that non-standard communication does not communicate anything other than itself. The second intersection has to do with the fact that non-standard communication does not take place between two agents but instead is how agency occurs in the first place.
The post I first published here on March 27, 2014 was expanded into a full, peer-reviewed paper. It was published online on June 14, 2018, in an open-access issue of Moment Journal dedicated to the topic of “Philosophy of Communication”. The issue was edited by Burcu Canar & Briankle G. Chang. The paper can now be accessed here. I’m thankful for the close reading and generous comments of the anonymous reviewers. Below, I share the updated list of references.
• • •
Agamben, Giorgio. (1993). The coming community. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Agamben, Giorgio. (2004). The open: Man and animal (Kevin Attell, Trans.). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Aristotle. (1986). On the soul (W.S. Hett, Trans.) Aristotle in twenty-three volumes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Aristotle. (2006). The “art” of rhetoric (John Henry Freese, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bataille, Georges. (1988). Inner experience (Leslie Anne Boldt, Trans.). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Besnier, Jean-Michel. (1988). La politique de l’impossible: l’intellectuel entre révolte et engagement. Paris: La Découverte.
Bizet, François. (2007). Une communication sans échange: Georges Bataille critique de Jean Genet. Genève: Droz.
Blanchot, Maurice. (2009). The unavowable community. Barrytown, NY: Station Hill.
Choukah, Sarah, and Philippe Theophanidis. (2016). “Emergence and Ontogenetics: Towards a Communication without Agent.” Social Science Information 55, no. 3 (September 1): 286–99.
Collier, Peter John. (1975). Georges Bataille: The theory and practice of communication. (doctoral dissertation or master’s thesis). University of London.
Craig, Robert T. (1999, May). Communication theory as a field. Communication Theory, 9(2), 119–161.
Derrida, Jacques. (1994). Given time. I, counterfeit money. (Peggy Kamuf, Trans.) Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Laruelle, François. (2010). The truth according to Hermes: Theorems on the secret and communication (Alexander R. Galloway, Trans.). Parrhesia, 9, 18–22.
Lasswell, Harold D. (1971). The structure and function of communication in society. In Wilbur Lang Schramm & Donald F. Roberts (Eds.), The process and effects of mass communication, (pp. 84–99). Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press.
Libertson, Joseph. (1982). Proximity, Levinas, Blanchot, Bataille and communication. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
Manzini, Frédéric. (2010, December). Verum index sui et falsi : de Spinoza à Boyle (à Aristote). Archives de Philosophie, 73(4), 741–744.
Mitchell, Andrew J., & Winfree, Jason Kemp (Eds.). (2009). The obsessions of Georges Bataille: Community and communication. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Nancy, Jean-Luc. (1991). The inoperative community. Peter Connor (Ed.). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Nancy, Jean-Luc. (1993). The decision of existence (Brian Holmes, Trans.), The birth to presence (pp. 82–109). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Nancy, Jean-Luc. (2000). Being singular plural (Robert D. Richardson & Anne Elizabeth O’Byrne, Trans.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Nancy, Jean-Luc. (2002, December 19) L’Intrus (Susan Hanson, Trans.) CR: The New Centennial Review, 2(3), 1–14.
Sapienza, Zachary S., Iyer, Narayanan, & Veenstra, Aaron S. (2015, September 3). Reading Lasswell’s model of communication backward: Three scholarly misconceptions. Mass Communication and Society, 18(5), 599–622.
Shannon, Claude Elwood. (1948). A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Systems Technical Journal, 27, 379–423.
Spinoza, Benedictus de. 1844. Benedicti de Spinoza Opera quae supersunt onmia. Leipzig: Tauchnitz.
Spinoza, Benedictus de. 1889. The Chief Works of Benedict de Spinoza: De Intellectus Emendatione. Ethica. Correspondence. Abridged. (R.H.W. Elwes, Trans.). London: George Bell and Sons.
Thacker, Eugene. 2010. Mystique and Mysticism. In Alexander R. Galloway (ed.), French theory today. An introduction to possible futures, pp. 24–29. The Public School. New York: Erudio Editions.
Watkin, William. 2014. Agamben and indifference: A critical overview. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Watzlawick, Paul, Beavin, Janet Helmick, & Jackson, Don D. (1967). Pragmatics of human communication: A study of interactional patterns, pathologies, and paradoxes. New York: Norton.
This newsletter serves one purpose only: it sends a single email notification whenever a new post is published on aphelis.net, never more than once a day. Upon subscribing, you will receive a confirmation email (if you don’t, check your spam folder). You can unsubscribe at any time.